June 30, 2010

Study Finds Dry Cities Have Cheap Water

Article Tools

Create a Link to this Article
3 Comments

Vista, CA  - June 28, 2010 -A first-of-its-kind study evaluating residential water use and charges in 30 metropolitan areas of the United States finds that some drought-plagued, “dry” cities in the country actually have the lowest water rates in the nation.

The study was conducted by the Circle of Blue, a news and communications organization focusing on water-related issues.

The study found that a family of four using approximately 100 gallons of water per day pays about $34 per month in Phoenix, AZ, a dry city that has chronic water shortages.

However, the same amount of water used in Boston, MA, generally believed to be “water-rich,” costs $65--nearly twice as much.

Similarly, the same family of four living in Las Vegas, NV, another dry city, pays about $33 per month. Yet in Atlanta, with 10 times the amount of rainfall as Las Vegas, the charge is $73 per month.

“Some of this is the result of water infrastructure issues,” says Klaus Reichardt, CEO and founder of Waterless Co., makers of Waterless No-Flush™ urinals. “Boston and Atlanta are older cities with older water delivery systems.  These are often costly to operate. Phoenix and Las Vegas [on the other hand] have newer, more efficient systems.”

The study also revealed:

·       Santa Fe, NM, has the highest overall water rates in the country for high-volume users.

·       People in Boston use the smallest amount of water per day, 41 gallons.

·       People in Fresno, CA, use the most, 211 gallons.

“The big problem here is that rates are so low in some dry cities [that] they encourage water use instead of conservation,” says Reichardt.

But there is also some good news in the study. Water use in cities such as Milwaukee, Los Angeles -- even Las Vegas and Santa Fe-- has actually dropped in recent years, according to Reichardt.

“These findings,” he adds, “show that [water] conservation is possible, but to achieve its full potential, must be encouraged across the country.”

Available for Presentations on Water Conservation:
Klaus Reichardt is founder and CEO of Waterless Co Inc., manufacturer of No-Flush Urinals, Vista, Calif. Reichardt founded the company in 1991 with the goal to establish a new market segment in the plumbing fixture industry with water conservation in mind. Reichardt is a frequent writer and presenter, discussing water conservation issues.  He can be reached at klaus@waterless.com.

About Waterless
Waterless Co. Inc. has established a reputation as an innovative manufacturer, serving the building, plumbing, and janitorial industry for over 18 years.  Based in Vista, Ca, Waterless Co. offers quality, innovation and expertise in water conservation and high efficiency products for building owners with a full line of Waterless No-Flush urinals, cleaning liquids, and cost saving accessories.  Visit: www.waterless.com

Advertisement

What Do You Think?

Post a Comment

Howard Heil

July 6th, 2010 7:18 AM PT

Water rates are mostly based on production costs, condition of system,costs to maintain system,debt,and amount of cushion leaders desire to safely sustain adequate future supply.

Nico Maco

July 2nd, 2010 3:38 PM PT

This "study" is fallacious. You cannot compare apples in one city with oranges in another and bananas yet another. Neither can you compare water rates in different cities as if there was a market based on supply and demand. In most of the U.S. water is a socialized good, not a market commodity. Thus, water rates are based on cost to produce drinkable water (collection, transport, treatment, storage, distribution, etc) which is highly variable from one city and one state to another. I suspect the data is highly cherry picked to prove a relationship that doesn't exist in all cases. Dry cities have low water rates and wet cities have high water rates for reasons not explained in the article. Look, murder rates have been correlated to full moon cycles in the summer. But correlation is not causation. Apparently this is another of those garbage water in and garbage water out studies.

aray1980

July 1st, 2010 2:57 PM PT

For one of my classes for my grad degree, I did a similar study and found the same to be true. Not only that, but I also found some "water-rich" cities to have more emphasis on water conservation initiatives than "water-poor" cities. In both cases, be it pricing or conservation initiatives, one would think that "water-poor" cities would have an more of an interest in aggressive pricing and conservation programs. I do understand that there is a water management paradigm of the West that primarily focuses on "use it or lose it." However, this notion was initiated around the reclamation act era during the early 1900s; things are a lot different now. Bottom line is that there needs to be a paradigm shift to sustainable water management in order to sustain current and future populations.

Post a Comment

Not a subscriber? Sign Up
 
 
*