May-June 2009

Contract for Conservation

Innovative sustainable design and low water usage sets Alamo Creek apart from other residential developments.

Article Tools

Create a Link to this Article
Alamo Creek Development

Photo: Dahlin Group Architecture Planning

By Margaret Buranen

1 Comments

Alamo Creek, a northern California development of 927 residences on 600 acres, features a variety of attractive homes with well-matched landscaping. But what sets this development apart is innovative sustainable design that has resulted in incredibly low volume of water usage, both inside and outside of the homes.

Alamo Creek was not an easy project to take from idea to finished homes. Its developer, Shapell Homes of Milpitas, CA, faced numerous challenges in making this community a reality.

The first major challenge came from the location proposed for Alamo Creek. The town of Danville (population 41,700) is an upscale suburb of San Francisco’s East Bay, located about 15 miles from Berkeley and Oakland. Building Alamo Creek in an unincorporated part of Contra Costa County, on the edge of the East Bay Municipal Utility District (EBMUD), meant that there was no entity required to supply water to the new development.

EBMUD, the closest water supplier, serves more than 1.3 million customers in an area of 330 square miles. Like the management of many utilities in California and other states, its leaders were concerned about having enough water to meet the increasing needs of the current customers within its service area.

Photos: Dahlin Group Architecture Planning
Alamo Creek is located in an unincorporated part of Contra Costa County, CA; therefore, there was no entity required to supply water to the new development.

Shapell Homes and EBMUD jointly turned the garage of one of the model homes into an educational exhibit on water conservation.

Agreeing to provide water for homes in a large development that it didn’t have to service was inviting criticism from both current customers and government and utility regulatory officials. Furthermore, servicing these new customers would make any future water shortage worse.

Like many water suppliers, EBMUD had become increasingly focused on the need to conserve water. The East Bay watersheds recorded just 16.46 inches of rain in 2007 (the fourth-driest year) and 20.45 inches in 2008 (the 19th-driest year).

Asking for an inclusion for water service got Shapell Homes nowhere. The only way that EBMUD would sign on to become Alamo Creek’s water supplier was if its developer would agree to incredibly stringent water conservation measures.

EBMUD demanded an unprecedented, but clear, goal of mitigation: zero-net impact on the amount of water required, with two gallons saved for each gallon used. To achieve these unprecedented goals, Shapell Homes would have to have support from each resident, not only at the time of home purchase, but as long as one lived there. And whenever a home in Alamo Creek was sold, the new owner would have to continue to follow strict water-saving guidelines.

Advertisement

These required measures that EBMUD spelled out were so drastic that they would permanently affect each residential unit and the community buildings within Alamo Creek. Christopher Truebridge and James Gold, President and Vice President, respectively, of Shapell Homes, realized that this degree of restriction on water usage could adversely affect home sales.

But with no other utility close enough to supply water, Shapell Homes was out of options. Even though its owners had never tried to achieve such low water usage rates in any of their other projects and didn’t know of any developers in California or elsewhere who had, their only choice was to do it EBMUD’s way or build Alamo Creek somewhere else. Next Page >

What Do You Think?

Post a Comment

Michael Sevener

September 4th, 2009 7:18 AM PT

No rainwater harvesting???

Post a Comment

Not a subscriber? Sign Up
 
 
*