May-June 2008

A New Era

Anxious water districts, green plumbers, and Australian marketers predict blue skies ahead for graywater.

Article Tools

Create a Link to this Article

Additional Article Content

By Ed Ritchie

1 Comments

Art Ludwig, of Oasis Water, was more than pleasantly surprised when 75 plumbers and water-related tradespeople were waiting to attend his graywater workshop at the unfriendly hour of 6:30 a.m., in Cottonwood, AZ. “The hardware and regulations and political climate are all converging, and this issue of graywater use is accelerating,” says Ludwig, a consultant that has worked on water and wastewater systems in over 20 countries around the world. Arizona introduced new regulations for use of all types of reclaimed water on January 16, 2001.

Graywater is defined as wastewater, collected separately from sewage flow, which originates from a clothes washer, bathtub, shower, or sink—but not from a kitchen sink, dishwasher, or toilet. Arizona allows residents to use it for landscape irrigation up to 400 gallons per day, without any formal permitting process. But, users must adhere to 13 best management processes.

Graywater, as a conservation method, has gained wide acceptance with water agencies in drought-ridden Australia, but not in the US, where it’s been constricted by public indifference, as well as inconsistent health and building codes. Despite these challenges, some states (New Mexico recently adopted most of Arizona’s guidelines) and water agencies are pushing ahead, and, as Ludwig noted, their efforts are about to get a significant boost from a convergence of powerful forces.

To start, the demand for conservation is growing. Consider the severe drought conditions in states such as California, Arizona, and Georgia, says Val Little, director of the Water Conservation Alliance of Southern Arizona, at the University of Arizona. “Absolutely, there is a growing urgency, and, because of the desert and scarce rainfall, Arizona has been at this much longer than other areas of the country,” Little says. “People are paying attention, and they are more willing to entertain ideas, regulations, and incentives that they would not pay attention to five or ten years ago. On the other side, water is becoming more expensive to find, pump, treat, and deliver. So, there’s some additional pressure.”

Photo: Soquel Creek Water District
A water-wise plant and grass workshop

California offers a prime example of the pressurized connection between water and energy. In 2005, the state’s Energy Commission released a study that said 19% of the state’s electricity and 33% of its natural gas and diesel was consumed by water in some way. The situation gets worse during droughts, because hydro-electricity falls, yet the energy demands rise due to lower water supplies and deeper groundwater levels, that require even more energy to pump water to the surface.

Unfortunately for California, complicated laws have restricted progress, and spawned some instances of negative publicity, such as the media attention given to bootleggers known as “Graywater Guerillas” (see sidebar).  However, California’s regulations are part of the inspiration for a graywater pilot program conducted by the Metropolitan Water District (MWD) of southern California, a cooperative of 26 cities and water agencies serving 18 million people in six counties. The MWD imports water from the Colorado River and northern California to supplement local supplies, and helps its members to develop water resource-management programs.

Regarding water conservation, the district holds a grant competition to find water conservation products to add to its roster of consumer products that qualify for rebates. Two graywater products won grants of $75,000 each to prove their worthiness for future consumer rebates from district water customers, and, naturally, their legality in California. “One of the things we’re interested in is the bureaucracy and how hard it is to get permits from local cities,” says Bill McDonnell, MWD’s senior resource specialist. “What can be done to streamline the process and get the information to the inspectors easily? A lot of our cities want to know how that works.”

Advertisement

If the products prove to be viable conservation tools, the information will be distributed to MWD members and the district will recommend them for rebates. Just as importantly, the district has a legislative group that promotes water conservation legislation. “If we had a report that said these graywater products are good, but there’s a challenge from state rules and regulations, we would ask the legislature folks if it was something they could work on,” McDonnell says.

Legislation is definitely the problem, according to water conservation consultant John Koeller, P.E., of Koeller and Company, in Yorba Linda, CA. Koeller has authored many research reports for the California Urban Water Conservation Council, and notes that municipalities and water districts haven't promoted graywater products and solutions because of the “patchwork” of health codes throughout the US. Next Page >

What Do You Think?

Post a Comment

watergrrll

July 30, 2008 11:48 AM PT

great article about a subject that is long overdue its seat at the conservation table.

Post a Comment

Not a subscriber? Sign Up
 
 
*  
 




 

Get Water Efficiency Email Updates!

Get weekly news and updates through our Water Efficiency email newsletter!