July-August 2010

Finding Leaks at the Source

Leak detection plays a vital role in water conservation, allowing lines to be repaired before a catastrophic failure takes place.

Article Tools

Create a Link to this Article

Photo: PPIC

By Diane Gow McDilda

Comments

While to other countries, the United States is considered relatively young, our infrastructure is aging. When it comes to our water distribution networks, utilities and municipalities can benefit from detecting smaller leaks before they surface or become catastrophic.

Not only have small leaks been shown to be precursors to larger leaks and failures, repair of an existing leak means bringing non-revenue water back into the system. Leak detection not only plays a vital role in water conservation, but in the framework of risk management, allowing lines to be repaired before a catastrophic failure takes place requiring street and business closures, overtime pay for workers, and inconvenient shutoffs for rate payers.

Tried and True
Traditional methods of finding leaks remain relatively unchanged, listing for them. Listening for, and then tracing, a whoosh, clink, or hiss back to its source is done in assorted ways with various types of equipment.

Operators can walk the length of pipe, listening to the ground with microphones and headsets. This method is time-consuming and often only used when trying to pinpoint a leak detected by other means.

Data loggers are frequently used to collect measured noises within a pipe. They can be left in place for a set amount of time, say 30 minutes or longer, based on the type of information being gathered. Collection of data from the loggers can be performed, either by removing the logger and downloading the data or via radio to personnel walking or in vehicles.

Photo: Miami-Dade
The primary purpose of the Miami-Dade County leak detection program is saving water, which is a scarcity in South Florida.
Photo: Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade uses three types of loggers placed 500 feet apart and programmed to collect five-minute readings over the course of an hour.
Photo: Miami-Dade
At the end of the day, loggers are returned to the data management unit, where data is downloaded and analyzed.

Using two sensors, a correlating logger measures the time it takes for the sound to reach each of the sensors and uses this to pinpoint a location of a leak. Smaller leaks make less noise, so the trick is to find small leaks before they cause major failures. But that’s easier said than done.

“We find leaks as small as two gallons a minute,” says Griff Machinski, account manager Fluid Conservation Systems (FCS), manufacturer and distributor of various types of leak detection equipment. “But there are variables like how close the leak is to one of our sensors. The smaller the leak, the closer it needs to be to the sensor.”

Miami-Dade County provides potable water under the watchful eye of the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) and uses three types of loggers to look for leaks in their system. The primary purpose of their leak detection program is saving water, a scarcity in South Florida and a requirement by the water management district.

“With our annual pumping permit, we’re required to have a leak detection program in place,” explains David Bridges, assistant superintendent for the water transmission and distribution division of the county’s water and sewer department, the largest public utility in southeastern US. “Initially in the 1980s, we had 30 to 32 people with traditional leak detection equipment, aqua scopes, and geophones walking the entire system, each foot of pipe. In the 1990s and 2000, we began purchasing the loggers and correlating loggers, and it advanced us greatly. Now we have 14 people in the field and we cover the entire system, water mains, and service lines, at least once every year.”

Deployment units pick up equipment from the data management unit at the start of the workday and review the water distribution atlas and develop a deployment plan. Deployment crews conduct field surveys and locate leaks using three types of loggers: the Aqualog-80 (FCS), SoundSens Logger (FCS), and Zcorr Digital Correlating loggers (Itron). All loggers are placed 500 feet apart and programmed to collect three five-minute readings over the course of an hour.

“They say you can cover 1,000 feet, but when we shorten it to 500 feet we get better results,” says Bridges. “But it depends on the type of pipe too. We deploy at 250 feet, and with PVC and pipes that are larger than four inches in diameter. Most of our pipes are less than 16 inches in diameters, so this approach works well.”

The crews also use aqua scopes on 24-inch, 36-inch, and 42-inch diameter pipes, because the access points on larger pipes are further apart.

“We’ll walk in between points with the traditional equipment,” says Bridges. “And we’ll put it down every 10 to 15 feet.”

At the end of the day, loggers are returned to the data management unit, where data from the inspections is downloaded and analyzed. If there appears to be a leak, further inspection is ordered.

Pinpoint units, as their name implies, pinpoint the exact location of the leak using geophones and aqua scopes. The county has found this equipment works better than correlators, because readings can be affected by pipe conditions, such as build up or a change in pipe size between correlation points.

Advertisement

When data is reviewed and leaks confirmed, the data management unit creates a work order ticket. The time from finding a leak to repairing the pipe is usually two weeks.

“When we first started the program in 2000, we found about 2,000 leaks; now we find about 1,400 leaks a year,” says Bridges. “Of the leaks we find, 80 to 90% have not broken ground and 10 to 20% have. When we started, it was the complete opposite. We’re more proactive and catch leaks before they get too big. It reduces the cost and the amount of water loss.” Next Page >

What Do You Think?

Post a Comment

Be the first to tell us what you think!

Post a Comment

Not a subscriber? Sign Up
 
 
*