July-August 2007

Meter Interface

As water conservation becomes an increasingly important concern, many districts are turning to AMR and data capturing technology to help ensure accurate meter reading.

Article Tools

Create a Link to this Article

By Carol Brzozowski

Comments


In the past, it used to take three employees 360 days a year to read the water monitors at a cost of about $108,000, making meter reading expensive and time-consuming.

It also was dangerous.

Many meters are located in the middle of warehouses and manufacturing facilities, meaning the city risked thousands of dollars in workers’ compensation payments for injuries that occurred while collecting water consumption data.

Additionally, there were hundreds of meters that were not read for a year because there were not enough workers to check each one to ensure it was properly functioning. That meant those whose water consumption was regularly recorded were subsidizing the users connected to the unread meters; additionally the city was not acquiring accurate revenues.

To address those challenges, Auburn Hills installed the FIREFLY AMR system throughout 2001. Using the FIREFLY AMR is expected to save the city a considerable sum of money over a 10-year period based on a 10-day meter-reading cycle each month.

Under the previous touch-pad system the city used, when three meter readers were needed to finish the job; the FIREFLY system only requires one meter reader. That one employee can complete the entire system in 18 days, gathering the data via radio frequency at a cost of $5,040 annually. The city’s savings in meter-reading costs have averaged more than $95,000 a year.

There hadn’t been much of a learning curve in using FIREFLY, says Melchert.

“We were already used to another touch pad meter-reading system, so we were going through the process of exporting a read file from our utility billing program to the reading software, then gathering the reads and importing that file back into the utility billing system,” he says.

The biggest change was using radio-frequency equipment and programming the meter interface units, though that operation was straightforward, he notes. In addition, Melchert points to Auburn Heights’ ability to send out accurate water bills each month as one of the city’s biggest gains in terms of water efficiency.

“The last time I measured it, about 99.5% of the reads were accurate, so we were able to clean up our non-read lists and replace hundreds of old meters that may have been reading slow,” he says. “We’ve been able to capture more revenue by getting a more accurate read in terms of consumption.”

Auburn Hills also uses the FIREFLY AMR data to assist customers in pinpointing leaks in their water systems.

“As the FIREFLY stores about 74 days of information, if we get a high bill complaint, we immediately do a profile,” Melchert says. “We are able to show them where water is actually going through the meter, what time of day, and we are able to help them have confidence that the meter is functioning properly and there really is a leak somewhere in their system.”

The city’s utility department will assist the customer in locating the leak, which could be within a toilet, a humidifier, or an ice machine, for example. Once the leak is located, it’s up to the customer to fix it.

Advertisement

While Auburn Hills officials considered many systems, Melchert says the FIREFLY AMR was chosen because of the profiling information that can be obtained over a period of more than two months. Additionally, other systems required more complex wiring setups.

“We removed the touch pad, placed the interface unit on, programmed it and we were off and running,” says Melchert. “That saved us about $60,000 in installation costs and labor.” Next Page >

What Do You Think?

Post a Comment

Be the first to tell us what you think!

Post a Comment

Not a subscriber? Sign Up
 
 
*  
 




 

Get Water Efficiency Email Updates!

Get weekly news and updates through our Water Efficiency email newsletter!