The Water Efficiency Blogs

The Blogger

Elizabeth Cutright Water Efficiency Editor

More from this blogger

  1. Bridging the Gap
  2. Mind the Gap
  3. Back to School
  4. The Future of Southwest Water
  5. What medium for your message
  6. We (Might) Need a Bigger Boat
  7. Worst Case Scenarios
  8. Healthy Conservation
  9. Sustaining Supply
  10. Secret Handshake
  11. Second City Water
  12. Spills, Bills and Climate Change
  13. When Water and Energy Collide
  14. Blue Fever LEED
  15. Recycled Winter
  16. Energy Awareness
  17. Pollution and Source Protection
  18. Conveyance Catch Up
  19. Volume and Vintners
  20. Smithsonian Smarts
  21. Imbedded Industry
  22. Shake, Rattle, and Roll
  23. Low-Flow Hubris
  24. High Efficiency Plumbing
  25. Water Saving at the Corporate Level
  26. Reuse Wrap Up
  27. Household Water Use
  28. What's Your Waterprint
  29. Lawsuits, Pipelines, and One Tiny Fish
  30. One Million Acre-Feet
  31. Rainwater Ordinance
  32. Gauging Risks
  33. Batten Down the Hatches!
  34. WaterSense for New Homes
  35. Tri-State Co-Op
  36. Nuclear Desalination
  37. What does a worst-case scenario look like
  38. All Bark and No Bite
  39. Subsidized Water
  40. Keeping It Local
  41. Private or Public
  42. What's Your Standard
  43. WE Professionals Take a Bow
  44. Pipe Bursts, News at 11
  45. Drought, Demand, and the GW Bogeyman
  46. Smart Water Use
  47. Delta Update
  48. Alternative Sources
  49. Water Saved Is Water Earned
  50. Mile-High Metering
  51. Smart Water Grid
  52. Seeing Into the Future
  53. Can Two Rights Make a Wrong
  54. Thinking Big, Going Small
  55. The Dead Zone
  56. Pipe Dreams
  57. Interdependency
  58. Low-Tech Leak Detection
  59. Money-Management Musical Chairs
  60. A First for Rainwater Harvesting
  61. Purpose and Intent
  62. Drought Dangers
  63. All Eyes on the West
  64. Climate Chaos
  65. Preemptive Strike
  66. A Place With No Meters
  67. Water Buffaloes in the Delta
  68. Wildfires and Water Conservation
  69. National Drinking Water Week
  70. Tainted Water
  71. Hit them in the pocketbook!
  72. The Place to Be
  73. Where the WE's Are
  74. Let's Be Friends
  75. Free Market Water
  76. Role Model
  77. Budget Basics
  78. Breaking It All Down
  79. Unsung Heroes
  80. It's Raining, It's Pouring..
  81. Meter Management
  82. Finding Funding
  83. Turning Lemons Into Lemonade
  84. New Rules for a New Year
  85. Is it a water grab or a reasonable solution
  86. Drops and Crops
  87. Dear Santa..
  88. Not Just Storm Clouds on the Horizon
  89. Wondering After a Winter Break
  90. Virtual Water
  91. Water and Compromise
  92. Reuse Revisited
  93. Turf Revisited
  94. Taking it to the Next Level
  95. The Nine Steps
  96. Water Lemons
  97. To Turf or Not to Turf
  98. News You May Have Missed
  99. The Wall Street Ripple Effect
  100. Let it Rain!
  101. Another Perspective
  102. De-Centralizing
  103. Personal Responsibility Versus Government Action
  104. Field Trippin' in the Garden
  105. Grand Theft Water
  106. Drowning Dragon
  107. Money Changes Everything
  108. Sharks! Tomatoes! Astroturf!
  109. Titans of Industry - Should Big Business Control The Tap
  110. Welcome to the New Site!
view all

WE Editor's Blog

April 27th, 2009 10:36am PST

Finally...Teamwork

Posted By Elizabeth Cutright Comments

The role of the water purveyor—also known as any public utility, mutual water company, county water district, or municipality that delivers drinking water to customers—involves a variety of responsibilities. Not only do water agencies control and manage supply and delivery, but they must also handle everything from stormwater and flood control to wastewater and water quality, habitat protection, and other environmental concerns. As a result, the water purveyor is the ultimate multitasker—charged with overseeing projects and solving problems while making sure that the community can depend upon clean and reliable water. In other words, the work of the water purveyor involves integrated water resources management. 

Generally speaking, integrated water resources management involves the consideration of multiple water management viewpoints when considering courses of action. These voices include “management agencies with specific purposes, governmental and stakeholder groups, geographic regions, and disciplines of knowledge.” This could involve the organization of a task force or even the collaboration of different agencies all charged with finding the best solution for the issue at hand, be it river basin planning, conservation outreach, or aqueduct recharge. Because there are many competing water needs, it’s important to involving as many participants in the process as possible. 

While the implementation of integrated water resources management depends upon the situation, “Total Water Management” has been coined to describe the inclusion of  “integration principals” in water supply development.  In 1996, the AWWA defined Total Water Management as “the exercise of stewardship of water resources for the greatest good of society and the environment,” that includes: 

* Encouraging planning and management on a natural water systems basis through a dynamic process that adapts to changing conditions
* Balancing competing uses of water through efficient allocation that addresses social values, cost effectiveness, and environmental benefits and costs
* Requiring the participation of all units of government and stakeholders in decision-making through a process of coordination and conflict resolution
* Promoting water conservation, reuse, source protection, and supply development to enhance water quality and quantity
* Fostering public health, safety, and community goodwill

Following in that same vein, last week the US House of Representatives passed the National Water Research and Development Initiative Act. Essentially, the bill legislates total water management by mandating the coordination of national research and development efforts to “provide a clear path forward to ensure adequate water supplies for generations to come.”

Highlights of the bill include:

* The creation of a National Water Initiative Coordination Office for technical and administrative support, as well as public “point of contact”

* The requirement that the president establish or designate an interagency committee that will include representation from all federal agencies dealing with water so that a National Water Research and Development Initiative can be implemented in order to improve federal activities on water, including research, development, demonstration, data collection and dissemination, education, and technology transfer

* The interagency committee would be responsible for the implementation of a national water census, the development of new water technologies and techniques, the development of tools to facilitate water resource conflicts, the development of information technology systems to enhance water quality and supply, the improvement of hydrologic prediction models, an enhanced understanding related to ecosystem services, and an analyses of the energy-water nexus

In a statement, bill author and Science and Technology Committee Chairman Bart Gordon (D-TN) says, “Coordination of federal agency activities and a stronger partnership with state, local, and tribal governments will ensure that federal programs are focused on areas of greatest concern, and that our efforts are complementary and effective.”

So what do you think? Is integrated water resource management the ultimate water efficiency practice? And if it is, will the National Water Research and Development Initiative Act pave the way for nationwide efficiency programs?

Click here for more information on the bill.

What Do You Think?

Post a Comment

Be the first to tell us what you think!

Post a Comment

Not a subscriber? Sign Up
 
 
*