The Water Efficiency Blogs

The Blogger

Elizabeth Cutright Water Efficiency Editor

More from this blogger

  1. Bridging the Gap
  2. Mind the Gap
  3. Back to School
  4. The Future of Southwest Water
  5. What medium for your message
  6. We (Might) Need a Bigger Boat
  7. Worst Case Scenarios
  8. Healthy Conservation
  9. Sustaining Supply
  10. Secret Handshake
  11. Second City Water
  12. Spills, Bills and Climate Change
  13. When Water and Energy Collide
  14. Blue Fever LEED
  15. Recycled Winter
  16. Energy Awareness
  17. Pollution and Source Protection
  18. Conveyance Catch Up
  19. Volume and Vintners
  20. Smithsonian Smarts
  21. Imbedded Industry
  22. Shake, Rattle, and Roll
  23. Low-Flow Hubris
  24. High Efficiency Plumbing
  25. Water Saving at the Corporate Level
  26. Reuse Wrap Up
  27. Household Water Use
  28. What's Your Waterprint
  29. Lawsuits, Pipelines, and One Tiny Fish
  30. One Million Acre-Feet
  31. Rainwater Ordinance
  32. Gauging Risks
  33. Batten Down the Hatches!
  34. WaterSense for New Homes
  35. Tri-State Co-Op
  36. Nuclear Desalination
  37. What does a worst-case scenario look like
  38. All Bark and No Bite
  39. Subsidized Water
  40. Keeping It Local
  41. Private or Public
  42. What's Your Standard
  43. WE Professionals Take a Bow
  44. Pipe Bursts, News at 11
  45. Drought, Demand, and the GW Bogeyman
  46. Smart Water Use
  47. Delta Update
  48. Alternative Sources
  49. Water Saved Is Water Earned
  50. Mile-High Metering
  51. Smart Water Grid
  52. Seeing Into the Future
  53. Can Two Rights Make a Wrong
  54. Thinking Big, Going Small
  55. The Dead Zone
  56. Pipe Dreams
  57. Interdependency
  58. Low-Tech Leak Detection
  59. Money-Management Musical Chairs
  60. A First for Rainwater Harvesting
  61. Purpose and Intent
  62. Drought Dangers
  63. All Eyes on the West
  64. Climate Chaos
  65. Preemptive Strike
  66. A Place With No Meters
  67. Water Buffaloes in the Delta
  68. Wildfires and Water Conservation
  69. National Drinking Water Week
  70. Finally Teamwork
  71. Tainted Water
  72. Hit them in the pocketbook!
  73. The Place to Be
  74. Where the WE's Are
  75. Let's Be Friends
  76. Free Market Water
  77. Role Model
  78. Budget Basics
  79. Breaking It All Down
  80. Unsung Heroes
  81. It's Raining, It's Pouring..
  82. Meter Management
  83. Finding Funding
  84. Turning Lemons Into Lemonade
  85. New Rules for a New Year
  86. Is it a water grab or a reasonable solution
  87. Drops and Crops
  88. Dear Santa..
  89. Not Just Storm Clouds on the Horizon
  90. Wondering After a Winter Break
  91. Virtual Water
  92. Water and Compromise
  93. Reuse Revisited
  94. Turf Revisited
  95. Taking it to the Next Level
  96. The Nine Steps
  97. Water Lemons
  98. To Turf or Not to Turf
  99. News You May Have Missed
  100. The Wall Street Ripple Effect
  101. Let it Rain!
  102. De-Centralizing
  103. Personal Responsibility Versus Government Action
  104. Field Trippin' in the Garden
  105. Grand Theft Water
  106. Drowning Dragon
  107. Money Changes Everything
  108. Sharks! Tomatoes! Astroturf!
  109. Titans of Industry - Should Big Business Control The Tap
  110. Welcome to the New Site!
view all

WE Editor's Blog

September 15th, 2008 6:52am PST

Another Perspective

Posted By Elizabeth Cutright 1 Comment

In our latest issue, we focus on Bullhead City, AZ’s decision to switch from decentralized wastewater treatment to a centralized system that incorporates water reuse. (Taking the Bull by the Horns ) As the article points out, among the many benefits resulting form this infrastructure overhaul is the added protection to the increasingly threatened Colorado River basin. 

Sometimes ditching septic tanks and consolidating your water treatment and delivery system makes sense, but in some communities the status quo can be tweaked or improved upon rather than abandoned completely.  In many parts of the country, communities are choosing to move from centralized treatment systems to onsite water treatment systems.  Their decisions are often based on the realization that small, cluster systems can be economically and environmentally sound.  From large municipalities and to small rural developments, the future of water treatment lies in decentralization – and the added advantage of water reuse makes decentralized water treatment an attractive option for communities committed to water conservation.

Such is the case in Rincon Point, California, a world famous surf spot that curves along the Pacific Ocean through two counties and three communities.  In July of 2007, the Ventura County Board of Supervisors opened the door for a centralized sewer system by unanimously passing a resolution designed to allow Rincon Point Homeowners to self impose a septic-to-sewer tax.  Those in favor of the resolution believe replacing the existing septic set up will solve the community’s pollution issues.  

But is this really their best option?

Why not replace the existing septic systems with modern onsite water treatment alternatives rather than installing a costly (and potentially habitat destroying) centralized sewer system?  When properly installed and maintained, onsite water treatment systems can not only meet federal and state effluent standards, but be engineered (via advanced treatments such as nutrient removal and disinfection) to actually benefit the environment in which they are placed.

The truth is sometimes septic systems fail; but so do centralized sewer systems, and often on a much grander scale.  Think of the thousands of miles of depression era pipes currently sitting quietly beneath city streets: ticking time bombs waiting to wreak havoc.  Imagine the potential pollution catastrophe when one of those 75-year-old sewer mains ruptures, spilling out all manner of muck and mayhem. 

By comparing a sewer-main break with the failure of a handful of residential septic systems it’s easy to see the gamble being waged by the residents of Rincon Point  - after all, isn’t it likely that switching from septic to sewer may merely delay coastal pollution while setting up Rincon for a much bigger problem 50 years from now?

 

 

What Do You Think?

Post a Comment

Michael Sevener

September 17th, 2008 10:28 AM PT

This is a good start on a "soft path" approach but does not go nearly far enough. We should be looking at integrated management including rainwater harvesting and onsite composting toilets for less densely populated areas. Our "modern" centralized systems are quite young. We only have about 150 years worth of operating experience. We do not know with any certainty how much older and long lived central sewer systems (such as those built by the Romans) behave over the course of centuries, nor the cost to maintain them. We obviously need centralized collection and treatment in densely populated cities but we do not need such systems in suburbia. As a matter of fact, the standard roman villa incorporated the concept of "impluvium" for collecting rainwater for its own use. Expensive aqueducts and piped systems were reserved for the cities.

Post a Comment

Not a subscriber? Sign Up
 
 
*