The Water Efficiency Blogs

The Blogger

Cutright, Elizabeth

More from this blogger

Water Efficiency Editor's Blog

  • RSS
  • Save
  • Print
  • Email
Tuesday, February 07, 2012 8:00 AM

The Levy’s Run Dry

By: Cutright, Elizabeth Comments

Imagine water arriving to your home not silently and effortlessly through your faucet, but rumbling into town on the backs of tanker trucks delivering gallons collected miles away. In parts of Texas, this scenario is already a reality as many small communities find themselves on the verge of running out of water. In Spicewood, TX, for example, an 8,000-gallon truck delivery was the clearest indication that the village’s wells could no longer supply the regions 1,100 residents. As Texas continues into yet another dry year in the state’s historic two-plus year drought—one many are calling the worst the state has experienced in the last 60 years. 

While recent rains have helped remove some areas of the state—including Dallas–Fort Worth—from the federal drought map, the truth is that 90% of the state is still struggling with severe drought conditions. With Texas reservoirs at less than 65% capacity—the lowest recorded levels since 1978—many communities are discovering that water use restrictions are not enough to get them over the hump. As a result, many towns and cities are digging wells, constructing new pipelines, and trucking in water.

Meanwhile, in Nevada, the Southern Nevada Water Authority (SNWA)—which provides water to Las Vegas—is asking for an 80% increase in its groundwater allocation. The increase would amount to a withdrawal of up to 105,000 acre-feet per year from the groundwater located in four rural valleys that surround the city. In the past, the SNWA has requested changes to groundwater distributions, but the Nevada Supreme Court struck down two previous attempts in 2007 and 2008. City Engineer Jason King must decide by March of this year how much the water authority can pump to the city through “a proposed $3.5 billion network of pipes stretching more than 300 miles” (www.rgj.com/article/20120204/NEWS07/120204005/Vegas-revises-request-rights-rural-water). Water recycling is also part of the city’s plan as well, with water officials promising that reuse could stretch allocations enough to supply almost 360,000 single-family homes.

Critics of the SNWA plan argue that tapping rural water supplies to feed urban demand would decimate local ranching communities and negatively impact delicate desert habitats, but deputy water authority general manager John Entsminger believes that the request is justifiable. Entsminger is quoted by the Review-Journal as stating, “Southern Nevada needs to diversify away from its 90% dependence on the Colorado River.” Las Vegas currently draws almost all its water from the Lake Mead reservoir behind Hoover Dam.

“The state engineer has been saying for the past 10 to 15 years that the proper way to develop groundwater is to do this sort of staged development,” continues Entsminger. “We believe we have provided a conservative plan for development ... that will protect the resource, allow for the collection of new data, and provide Southern Nevada with a new water supply.”

So what do you think? What can we learn about by comparing and contrasting the situation in Texas to what’s playing out in Nevada? Both states have been lauded for their effective water resource management, but are they doing enough? And how much longer before we see an all out war between rural water users and their urban counterparts?


This image from NASA, posted yesterday, shows that both Texas and Las Vegas are nowhere near out of the woods—their situations will only get worse. 
 

What Do You Think?

 

Jim

Sunday, February 12, 2012

My thoughts are that there is a limit that will ultimately be reached for the resource. To destroy the reserve for the rural communities that generally are supply side communities, just to preserve for a short interval, communities that have suddenly been created, obviously in conflict with the available resource, is short sighted to say the least. When the underground resource is exhausted, the large communities will just up and leave, as many are doing now anyway. Destroy the resource and your destroy any viability of any communities to survive. This is all assuming that these droughts are going to continue. Who knows, but if they do, Katy bar the door.

Larry Stephens, P.E.

Friday, February 10, 2012

It's time to give serious consideration to point-of-use treatment and reuse. And by reuse, I mean direct reuse for non-potable purposes --- like toilet flushing, laundry, etc. In some settings, this means we can use the water 3 to 5 times before it is discharged to surface or groundwaters; in addition to saving on energy costs to move that water great distances.

Jennifer Nations

Wednesday, February 08, 2012

The actual amount requested is 105 THOUSAND acre-feet, not 105 AF as noted in your article above. That makes a big difference!

Post a Comment

Note from the Editor: The content that appears in our "Comments" section is supplied to us by outside, third-party readers, and organizations and does not necessarily reflect the view of our staff or Forester Media—in fact, we may not agree with it—and we do not endorse, warrant, or otherwise take responsibility for any content supplied by third parties that appear on our website. All comments are subject to approval.

CAPTCHA Validation
CAPTCHA
Code:

 

Water Efficiency Email Updates!

Get weekly news and updates through our email newsletter!