The Water Efficiency Blogs

The Blogger

Cutright, Elizabeth

More from this blogger

Water Efficiency Editor's Blog

  • RSS
  • Save
  • Print
  • Email
Tuesday, February 12, 2013 12:39 PM

Is the UN’s Water Policy Being Hijacked?

By: Cutright, Elizabeth Comments

In recognition of dwindling water supplies on a global scale, back in 2010 the United Nations Generally assembly announced that 2013 would be the “International Year of Water Cooperation” (IYWC).  The hope is that “given the intrinsic nature of water as a transversal and universal element,” the United Nation’s IYWC could incorporate all aspects of UNESCO’s water policy, including a “multidisciplinary approach which blends the natural and social sciences, education, culture, and communication.”

The goal of IYWC is to raise awareness and promote cooperation in order to meet “the challenges facing water management in light of the increase in demand for water access, allocation, and services.” The UN plans to use 2013 to  “highlight the history of successful water cooperation initiatives, as well as identify burning issues on water education, water diplomacy, transboundary water management, financing cooperation, national/international legal frameworks, and the linkages with the Millennium Development Goals.”

But some worry the UN’s message is being co-opted and hijacked by commercial and private interests. Maude Barlow, chairperson for the Council of Canadians and former senior adviser to the president of the UN General Council, tells Inter Press Services News Agency (IPS News), “We don’t need the United Nations to promote private sector participation under the guise of greater ‘cooperation’ when these same companies force their way into communities and make huge profits from the basic right to water and sanitation.”

Instead, Barlow believes that what is really called for is for “the United Nations to ensure that governments are fulfilling their obligations to provide basic services rather than relinquishing to transnational corporations.”

As an example of what this corporate influence looks like, Barlow points out that Aguas de Barcelona, a water company that is currently fighting with Spain over control to drinking water rights, is currently participating in IYWC, as is Nestle—a company that, as Barlow points out, advocates setting aside 1.5% of the world’s water for the poor, leaving the remaining 98.5% on the open market. Nestle’s plans could create a future where, Barlow warns, “here will one day be a water cartel similar to big oil, making life and death decisions about who gets water and under what circumstances every day.”

What Do You Think?

 

Mark

Thursday, February 14, 2013

Why would we want the UN to run any policy? They have created more turmoil in their short existance than all of the years prior to it. The UN believe it or not, is trying to make every nation equal not at the level of life quality we are custom to but instead at a third world status so they can better control us. Please, please, please quit trying to put the UN on a pedistal

Stan Gage

Wednesday, February 13, 2013

The commentary by Ms. Cutright appears to take issue with the idea that private enterprise is involved in development and distribution of water and then, by default, suggesting that water should only be served up by government enterprise. Quite to the contrary, I would suggest that common observation would direct thinking towards the conclusion that governmental directed enterprise more often than not lacks the creativity and sound leadership that will be necessary to effect policies that will result in the wise and yet fair use of increasingly scarce water supply. This is particularly true in regards to directing enterprise services that are paid for by users based on quantities used rather than paid for by taxation.

Like it or not water availability is going to be a flashpoint for conflict in the near future whether or not guided by public or private enterprise. Government should do its part in promoting the utilization of crops (GM or otherwise) and water usage technology which make more effective use of the available resource. But, beyond that government might do well to stay out of development and distribution where private enterprise has better access to capital and creative thinking that will derive a better and more cost effective resource use in the long run.

Gregory M. Baird

Wednesday, February 13, 2013

UN studies project that 30 nations will be water scarce in 2025, up from 20 in 1990. Eighteen of them are in the Middle East and North Africa, including Egypt, Israel, Somalia, Libya and Yemen.

Governments and military planners around the world are aware of the impending problem; with the US senate issuing reports with names like Avoiding Water Wars: Water Scarcity and Central Asia’s growing Importance for Stability in Afghanistan and Pakistan.

In March 2012, a report from the office of the US Director of National Intelligence said the risk of conflict would grow as water demand is set to outstrip sustainable current supplies by 40 per cent by 2030.

"Water too often is treated as a commodity, as an instrument with which one population group can suppress another"

-Ignacio Saiz, Centre for Economic and Social Rights

So the question is will UN backed multinational private interests in water scarcity help solve international conflicts or trigger it?

Post a Comment

Note from the Editor: The content that appears in our "Comments" section is supplied to us by outside, third-party readers, and organizations and does not necessarily reflect the view of our staff or Forester Media—in fact, we may not agree with it—and we do not endorse, warrant, or otherwise take responsibility for any content supplied by third parties that appear on our website. All comments are subject to approval.

CAPTCHA Validation
CAPTCHA
Code:

 

Water Efficiency Email Updates!

Get weekly news and updates through our email newsletter!